Table of MEMS Switch Characteristics (as of late 1997)
This table summarizes some reported characteristics of MEMS switches and
relays. The information was obtained via a query
sent to the mems@isi.edu mailing
list. If anyone wishes to add to or update the data listed
here, please email me at mpf@ai.mit.edu
.
Source |
[My estimate
of MOSFETs] |
Kruglick |
Schiele |
Zavracky |
Zavracky |
Zavracky |
YongHong |
Technology
status |
[Best
commercial
processes] |
Under
development |
Published1 |
Fabricated |
Projected |
Projected |
Best
available |
On
resistance
R |
[~ 10 kOhm] |
~ 2 Ohm |
10 Ohm |
1 Ohm |
|
|
500 mOhm
- 100 Ohm |
Gate
capacitance
C |
[30 fF] |
|
5 fF |
10 fF |
|
50 fF |
0.25 pF
- 0.5 pF |
Actuating
voltage V |
[1 V] |
5 V |
20-90 V |
100 V |
|
10 V |
2 V - 5 V |
Maximum
frequency f |
[~ 3 GHz] |
>= 1 kHz |
>= 3 kHz |
300 kHz |
100 MHz |
|
|
Area A |
[~ 1 µm2] |
|
100 µm
× 100 µm
= 104 µm2 |
65 µm
× 40 µm
= 2600 µm2 |
1 µm
× 3 µm
= 3 µm2 |
|
|
Thickness t |
[~ 1 µm] |
|
525 µm |
4 µm |
|
|
|
Volume v |
[~ 1 µm3] |
~ 9.6 × 105
µm3 |
5.35 × 106
µm3 |
10,400
µm3 |
|
|
500 µm
× 500 µm
× 20 µm
= 5 × 106
µm3 |
RC time
constant T |
[~ 0.3 ns] |
|
50 fs |
10 fs |
|
|
125 fs -
50 ps |
CV2 energy
E |
[3 × 10-14 J] |
|
2 × 10-12 J
- 4 × 10-11J |
10-10 J |
|
5 × 10-12 J |
10-12 J -
1.25 × 10-11 J |
CV2 RC
energy-delay
product |
[9 × 10-15 J ns] |
|
10-17 J ns -
2 × 10-15
J ns |
10-15 J ns |
|
|
1.25 × 10-16
J ns -
6.25 × 10-13
J ns |
CV2 RC v
quantity q |
[9 × 10-15
J ns µm3] |
|
5.35 × 10-11
J ns µm3 -
1.07 × 10-8
J ns µm3 |
1.04 × 10-11
J ns µm3 |
|
|
6.25 × 10-10
J ns µm3 -
3.12 × 10-6
J ns µm3 |
Discussion:
The first column of data shows, for comparison, the characteristics of
minimum-sized MOSFET switches in the fastest commercially available processes.
These are my own personal rough estimates gleaned through word-of-mouth;
I will refine them as I learn more specific details about what's available.
The rest of the columns show data for MEMS switches that was emailed
to me by the people listed, and quantities that I derived from that data.
One caveat: The thickness and volume numbers vary widely, in large part
because some contributors took the device thickness to be its height above
the wafer surface, whereas others took it to mean the normal wafer
thickness. What I actually intended was the device height plus the
minimum thickness of the wafer, after thinning, that would still
be sufficient to support the device structurally. This would
allow calculation of the maximum packing density of devices in 3-D, assuming
the substrate were thinned. The figures in the table have not yet
all been adjusted to be consistent with this interpretation.
General observations on the data:
-
Resistance: significantly lower in MEMS switches than in MOSFETs, as expected.
-
Capacitances are comparable between the two kinds of devices.
-
MEMS switches usually require much higher activating voltages, although
a few cases are reasonably low-voltage.
-
The maximum frequencies of MEMS switches are generally much lower.
This should improve, however, if they can be made smaller.
-
MEMS devices occupy much larger wafer surface areas than MOSFETs, although
this may change with time.
-
Consequently the effective volume of the devices is much larger (even if
the wafers are thinned).
Implications of the derived results:
-
Due to their low resistances, the RC time constants for MEMS switches
are several orders of magnitude smaller than for MOSFETs. This means
that when one MEMS switch is being used to turn another one on and off
adiabatically at a given speed, pure adiabatic charging is much more closely
approached than in MOSFET curcuits at the same speed.
-
Unfortunately, due to their high activating voltages, the CV2
energy dissipation of MEMS switches tends to be much larger. That
is, the energy that needs to be moved onto the switch control to activate
it is larger, by 2 to 4 orders of magnitude. This tends to offset
the energy-saving advantages of the lower RC.
-
The energy-delay product CV2 RC tends to be roughly
comparable between the MOS and MEMS switches, although there is several
orders of magnitude variation in this quantity for the different MEMS switches.
This means that, at a given speed (assuming that speed is attainable by
the MEMS device) of adiabatic switching, the MEMS switch may be either
more or less energy-efficient than the best MOSFET devices, depending on
the technology used. Schiele's parameters lead to one of the
best numbers for this so far, at 10-17 J ns, or 10-23
J/kHz. This is probably at least an order of magnitude lower than
will be achieved with MOSFETs in the next few years. So this could
be useful in low-energy computing applications in which speed, cost, and
size are not major concerns. A simple MEMS logic circuit switched
adiabatically at <1 kHz using that technology could dissipate less than
kT
ln 2 energy per switching event! (At room temperature.) In
other words, it would generate less than 1 bit of physical entropy per
switching op.
-
Finally, because of their large volumes, MEMS switches have a significantly
higher value of the quantity q (asked for in my original query)
than do MOSFETs. This means they are not a good solution for
trying to pack the maximum rate of computation into a given volume under
given heat-flux constraints. In other words, if the volume
filled by a bunch of adiabatically-operating MEMS switches was instead
filled by adibatically-operating MOSFETs, the MOSFETs (because of their
greater parallelism) would be capable of performing more total operations
per second within that volume, even when heat dissipation is taken into
account. However, if someday MEMS switches can be made at a size
comparable to MOSFET sizes, and with comparable activation voltages, at
that point they would then look very competitive.
Sources:
Other Links:
References:
1. |
I.Schiele, J.Huber, B. Hillerich, C. Evers, F. Kozlowski. Micromechanical
Relay with Electrostatic Actuation. Proceedings Transducers97, 9th International
Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago/USA, 16-19 June
1997 |
Misc. Notes:
Some manufacturers working on MEMS switches:
-
Analog Devices Inc.
-
CP Clare Corp.
-
EG&G IC Sensors
-
Siemens Electromechanical Components Inc.
-
Integrated Micromachines Inc. (startup)
-
Denny Miu (UCLA, Caltech)
-
Advanced Micromachines Inc. (startup)
-
Potter & Brumfield
-
Standard Microsystems Corp. (high-volume foundry)
-
Omron Electronics Inc.
Michael Frank
Last
modified: Sun Dec 7 16:48:40 EST